Strategic Site Readiness Program

Definitions

End User

“End User” means with respect to a site that is the subject an SSRP application, the person, either directly or through an affiliate, that will establish and operate the manufacturing or other commercial enterprise that constitutes the end use of the improved site.

Eligible Activities

“Eligible Activities” mean one or more of the following for an applicable site:

• Land acquisition and assembly;
• Site preparation and improvement;
• Infrastructure improvements that directly benefit the site, including without limitation, transportation; infrastructure, water and wastewater infrastructure, and utilities necessary to service the site;
• Any demolition, construction, alteration, rehabilitation, or improvement of buildings on the site;
• Environmental remediation; and
• Architectural, engineering, surveying, and similar professional fees.

Strategic Site

“Strategic Site” means a site, whether publicly or privately owned, that is, or subsequent to a proposed acquisition will be, used for manufacturing or another commercial use.

Mega-Strategic Site

A “Mega-Strategic Site” means a strategic site that is or will be used for a large industrial site.

Qualified Job

“Qualified Job” means a job performed by an individual who is a resident of this state whose Michigan income taxes are withheld by an employer, or an employee leasing company or professional employer organization on behalf of the employer, or by an individual who is not a resident of this state and is employed by a business at a project location that is located in this state, as determined and verified by the MSF.

Criteria

General Criteria for Consideration of all SSRP Awards:

To the extent reasonably applicable as reasonably determined by the MSF board to the type of project proposed, the MSF shall consider and document at least all of the following criteria for all SSRP awards before entering into a written agreement:

• The importance of the project or eligible activities to the community in which is located and Michigan;
• If the project will act as a catalyst for additional revitalization of the community where it is located and Michigan;
• The amount of local community and financial support for the project;
• The amount of any other economic assistance or support provided by Michigan for the project;
• The amount of any other economic assistance or support provided by the federal government for the project, including without limitation, federal appropriations or tax credits;
• The amount of any private funds or investments for the project, including the eligible applicant’s own investments in the project;
• The eligible applicant’s financial need for a grant, loan, or other economic assistance under the SSRP;
• The extent of reuse of vacant buildings, public or private, reuse of historic resources and redevelopment of blighted property;
• Creation or retention of qualified jobs as a result of a technological shift in product or production at the project location and within Michigan;
• Whether and how the project is financially and economically sound;
• Whether and how the project converts abandoned public buildings to private use;
• Whether and how the project promotes sustainable development;
• Whether and how the project involves the rehabilitation of a historic resource;
• Whether and how the project addresses area-wide redevelopment;
• Whether and how the project addresses underserved markets of commerce;
• The level and extent of environmental contamination;
• Whether and how the project will compete with or affect existing Michigan businesses within the same industry;
• Whether and how the project’s proximity to rail and utility will impact the performance of the project and will maximize energy and logistics needs in the community in which it is located, and in Michigan;
• The risk of obsolescence that the project, products, and investments in the future;
• The overall return on investment to Michigan;
• Whether the proposed strategic site or mega-strategic site is incorporated into a strategic plan of a political subdivision of Michigan; and
• Any other additional criteria approved by the MSF board that are specific to each individual project, and consistent with the purpose of the SSRP.

Specific Criteria for a Strategic Site Where an End User Has Not Been Identified

For a strategic site for which an end user has not been specifically identified, the MSF shall consider and document as reasonably determined by the MSF:

• Each of the general criteria for consideration of all SSRP awards listed above;
• The degree to which the proposed site demonstrates a high level of competitiveness for future development, considering and documenting all of the following:
  
  
• Whether the proposed site is currently assembled;
• Whether the proposed site is under site control; and
• Whether the proposed site is of a size, configuration, location, and condition that makes the site substantially ready for marketing and competitive for development upon completion of the SSRP award, and demonstrated matching contributions;
• Whether the proposed investment will result in the elimination of blight and the remediation of environmental contamination;
• The degree of local matching contributions;
• Whether the SSRP award will promote geographic equity in the distribution of funds among different areas of Michigan; and
  Whether the eligible applicant has pursued all available cost-containment measures.

Specific Criteria for a Mega-Strategic Site where an End User Has Not Been Identified

For a mega-strategic site for which an end user has not been specifically identified, the MSF shall consider, and document as reasonably determined by the MSF:

• Each of the general criteria for consideration of all SSRP awards listed above;
• The degree to which the proposed site demonstrates a high level of competitiveness for future development, considering and documenting all of the following:
  
  
• Whether the proposed site is currently assembled;
• Whether the proposed site is under site control; and
• Whether the proposed site is of a size, configuration, location, and condition that makes the site substantially ready for marketing and competitive for development upon completion of the SSRP award, and demonstrated matching contributions;
• Whether the proposed mega-strategic site is supported by a strategic analysis supports the demand for the proposed site;
• The feasibility of proposed land acquisition;
• Utility and transportation availability and the feasibilityof necessary utility and transportation improvements;
• Workforce availability and training capability; and
• Environmental and topographical conditions and the feasibility of necessary site improvements to address environmental and topographical conditions.

In making an award for a mega-strategic site without a specifically identified end user, the MSF, working in collaboration with the eligible applicant, shall prepare a mega-strategic site investment strategy and spending plan that details the sequence and cost of anticipated investments in the selected site, the benchmarks for bringing the mega-strategic site to a marketable condition, and the marketing strategy for the mega-strategic site. Each plan must have the objective of establishing a certified mega-strategic site under a nationally recognized third-party certification program.

Specific Criteria for a Strategic Site and a Mega-Strategic Site Where an End User Has Been Identified:

For a strategic site and a mega-strategic site for which an end user has been specifically identified, the MSF shall consider, and document as reasonably determined by the MSF:

• Each of the general criteria for consideration of all SSRP awards listed above;
• The strategic economic importance of the project to the community where it is located and Michigan;
• Whether the financial assistance is needed to secure the project in Michigan;
• The degree to which the project is a priority for the local governmental unit or local Economic development corporation in the jurisdiction of which the site is located;
• The level of creation or retention of qualified jobs as a result of a technological shift in product or production;
• Whether the qualified jobs created or retained as a result of a technological shift in product or production equal or exceed the average wage for the county in which the project is located;
• The level of capital investment; and
• The evidence of the end user’s commitment to the site.